Many masterpieces of Imagineering age like fine wines, getting better and becoming even more iconic over time. However, there are rides at Walt Disney World that have become increasingly outdated or even obsolete. This list covers the attractions–big and small–that are in need of overhauls or outright replacements.
There are a range of reasons that some attractions at Walt Disney World age better than others. A trio of Magic Kingdom classics–Haunted Mansion, Pirates of the Caribbean, and Jungle Cruise–all exemplify rides improving with each passing year, becoming beloved by a whole new generation of fans.
It would be easy to attribute that to one commonality, that all have received movie adaptations to keep interest high. While that’s certainly true of the Johnny Depp and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson helmed franchises, it’s not fair to say the same applies to Haunted Mansion (the first one…but also probably the second one). It didn’t enter the cultural zeitgeist thanks to a movie adaptation no one saw that scored 14% on Rotten Tomatoes.
Aging poorly is not necessarily indicative of an attraction’s quality. To the contrary, many rides on this list once were great, and still are in spite of that datedness. The commonality isn’t that they’re bad, but rather, that time has passed them by. This usually means technology has made them obsolete. There are plenty of examples of older attractions receiving redos that inject then-current technology, and incongruity appears between the original and updated components over time.
In other cases, attractions take a very contemporary approach to technology that simply does not hold up years later. We might call this “The Mummy Returns Effect.” That 2001 film leaned very much into bleeding edge (at the time) CGI, and the result is Dwayne Johnson’s Scorpion King now looking like it was rendered by a Sega Dreamcast. Meanwhile, older films like Jaws, E.T., Indiana Jones, Star Wars, and other old films still hold up because they didn’t get carried away.
The good news is that Walt Disney World and Imagineering are listening to fans. When we originally published this list, it included DINOSAUR, Soarin’ Over the World, and Buzz Lightyear’s Space Ranger Spin. All of those have now been retired, replaced, or recharged. And in looking over the list, there are several other entries that very obviously aren’t long for this world, based on both the last slate of D23 Expo announcements, and what’s rumored for 2026.
But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Instead, we’ll dig into the list of 10 attractions at Walt Disney World that have aged poorly and are urgently overdue for an overhaul or at least some updates…
Mission: Space — Mission: Space is actually a lot like Dinosaur in the sense that we want to love both. They’re based on undeniably cool concepts that are universally beloved by children…and the adult writing this. The idea of an outer space pavilion at EPCOT that offers excitement and education sounds like the perfect marriage of the park’s original mission.
Unfortunately, the execution leaves so much to be desired. The story isn’t compelling, the interactivity is phoned in and fails to engage, and the visuals are outdated and underwhelming. Misson: Space is basically what you get if you took a Sega arcade game from the early 2000s, put it in demo mode, and placed it on the back of a flatbed truck driven on I-4 by a typical Central Florida tourist. And somehow this was Walt Disney World’s most expensive attraction ever when it opened?!
Mission: Space is a generally unpleasant attraction that’s lacking in payoff. The thrill ride is discomforting instead of exhilarating, a difference that’s into stark relief by Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind, a ride that does just about everything better than Mission: Space. Every time we ride the two attractions back-to-back, Mission: Space feels more antiquated, due not just for a band-aid update, but outright replacement. Not to be one of those crazy, unrealistic EPCOT Center fans, but…bring back (a modernized) Horizons!
Spaceship Earth — This slow-moving dark ride through Audio Animatronics-heavy scenes showcasing the advancement of communication feels like it’s stuck in the past. Spaceship Earth was scheduled for a reimagining roughly 5 years ago, which was desperately needed. The track is in rough shape and the descent gives off abandoned mall vibes, with random black light triangles (rad!) and a sea of curtains cordoning off unused areas.
For an attraction highlighting how human communications have evolved, the way in which the ride communicates to guests–especially in the finale–likewise feels antiquated. One might argue that aspects of the attraction, ironically enough, fail to connect with guests with storytelling that’s clunky and a conclusion that fails to inspire. Humanity’s shared story is a compelling one and the ride’s location inside EPCOT’s iconic geodesic sphere is really cool, but Spaceship Earth squanders so much of its potential.
Purists might cringe at these criticisms, themselves (understandably) not wanting to rock the boat and lose the last of EPCOT’s Audio Animatronics-heavy attractions. However, the current state of the second-half of the attraction is embarrassing, the script is tired, and the cheesy screen-based ending is atrocious.
Spaceship Earth deserves better, and diehard fans shouldn’t have to fear a refurbishment because the end result might, somehow, be even worse. Imagineers did a fantastic job with Test Track 3.0 and other recent refreshes, which should reassure fans whenever they finally get around to Spaceship Earth.
CommuniCore Hall – This festival space that opened only two years ago has already aged poorly. There is, realistically, no chance of it being replaced in the next decade. That’s part of the idea in adding it here; it’s one of the few future-proofed entries on the list.
What’s amazing to me is that CommuniCore Hall is objectively worse than any festival space used at EPCOT in the last decade. That’s right, the new purpose-built festival venue that took 5 years and untold hundreds of millions of dollars to bring to life, is inferior to past makeshift spaces even from a festival perspective. CommuniCore Hall is almost impressively bad; the worst of all worlds.
All of the things it promised have been squandered. There’s the “state-of-the-art show kitchen” that Disney teased “may even attract a few special culinary guests.” There’s the “dynamic space to anchor” EPCOT Festivals and event space “limited only by the boundaries of imagination.” Those are all actual things that Disney stated about CommuniCore Hall.
Fast-forward two years, and CommuniCore Hall is barely used for festivals. It didn’t house anything except seating for last year’s flagship EPCOT Food & Wine Festival, and with the GoofyCore Hall takeover scheduled to overlap with the start of the 2026 festival, it probably won’t once again. That actually makes sense, as GoofyCore is the best utilization of CommuniCore, which should be an indictment of it as a festival space. Even though CommuniCore Hall isn’t technically an attraction and is new, it’s still deserving of a spot on this list.
If you want to disqualify CommuniCore Hall for whatever reason, there are a half-dozen films at EPCOT that are probably worthy of inclusion on this list. We cover those separately in We Only Skip One Ride at EPCOT, But We Avoid Several Shows. Pick one to replace CommuniCore Hall on this list if you so desire.
Tomorrowland Speedway – Plenty of Walt Disney World fans will argue that Tomorrowland Speedway should be demolished and replaced, as it takes up too much prime real estate in Magic Kingdom. That perspective contends that the concept is outdated, and that the ride is noisy, stinky, and simplistic.
They’re right and wrong. Like Dumbo and Seven Dwarfs Mine Train, Tomorrowland Speedway is a rite of passage attraction that is deserving of its place in Magic Kingdom. For kids, sitting in the driver’s seat and steering through a car course is really cool. However, children do not author blogs like this one (despite what the writing quality, or lack thereof, might suggest) so that perspective isn’t often voiced.
Nevertheless, if Tomorrowland Speedway is deemed ‘culturally significant’ (or whatever) and worthy of so much space in Magic Kingdom, it needs to be differentiate itself from dime-a-dozen go-cart rides. Replacing the fleet with modern vehicles having striking design styles and show scenes with personality would be a start. Make the cars fun for all ages, and the scenery worthy of a Sunday drive.
We’re curious as to how much overlap there will be with the upcoming Cars E-Ticket Replacing Rivers of America. That might make Tomorrowland Speedway redundant and ripe for replacement or redevelopment…along with over half of Tomorrowland. Hmmm.
Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor – We probably could save a decent amount of time and keystrokes with one entry for all of Tomorrowland. I personally really like Laugh Floor. The interactivity is fun, and Walt Disney World could use more attractions of this nature. However, Monsters Inc. Laugh Floor is a tech-heavy attraction that’s now showing its age.
With Monstropolis coming to Disney’s Hollywood Studios, the Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor in Tomorrowland becomes redundant. The secondary attraction in that land is a new show in Monstro Theater, which is taking over the space that formerly housed MuppetVision 3D.
That makes Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor redundant. Walt Disney World doesn’t need two separate Monsters, Inc. shows in two separate parks. Monstropolis is another move that frees up space on the board in an overhaul of Tomorrowland. This one could happen much sooner than Tomorrowland Speedway, and it wouldn’t surprise us if it’s a 2026 D23 Expo announcement.
Another theater show is probably what replaces Monsters, Inc. Laugh Floor given space constraints. The bigger questions concern characters featured. Potential options include Wall-E, Wreck-It Ralph, Big Hero Six, Lilo & Stitch, or the Incredibles. Really, though, it could be anything. It’s not like Monsters, Inc. is particularly futuristic!
Journey into Imagination with Figment — If you’re visiting EPCOT for the first time today, it’s impossible to understand how what appears to be a Spyro knock-off (he’s not) and his underwhelming attraction have such a fan following. You might just chalk it up to Disney Adult idiosyncrasies, much like I assume people are obsessed with Dunkin’ Donuts because they’ve never had any other doughnuts or coffee. In both cases, there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Figment is popular not for the existing attraction in its current sorry state, but for the original Journey into Imagination. If anything, the fact that the ride and its star character still have a powerful hold on adults of a certain age decades after they disappeared speaks volumes about the indelible impression they left on the youth of the 1980s and 1990s.
The original Journey into Imagination was mesmerizing. Above all else, it was imaginative, as cliche as that might sound. As a young child, I was spellbound by the original, its characters, and the evocative scenes they inhabited. I remember it in vivid detail not because my family rode it over and over (although we did!), but because it was a timeless attraction that captivated guests, sparked their imaginations, and forged lifelong Walt Disney World fans.
The replacement, Journey into Imagination with Figment, seems like it strives to annoy rather than inspire. Ironically enough, it showcases the power of imagination…with the least imaginative and obnoxious attraction possible. What was once an okay band-aid between the Figment-less Journey into Your Imagination and a new attraction has now outlived the original, and is looking really worse for wear.
Everything about it is outdated, the the first three-quarters of the ride-through feels like something is missing. What’s missing is imagination. It’s time to reimagine Journey into Imagination.
The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh — I’m going to say what everyone is thinking: Winnie the Pooh is a baller. No, you weren’t thinking that? Well, only because the Walt Disney Company has absolutely squandered the potential of Winnie the Pooh, sidelining he and his posse’s potential for pranks and tomfoolery.
In a just world, it would be Winnie the Pooh and not Paddington who is beloved by generations. Think about it, what does Paddington possess that Winnie the Pooh does not? Preserved jam sandwiches? Give me a break. Winnie the Pooh is a straight-up honey fiend, risking life and limb for a taste of the sweet stuff. Pooh is just as laid back, chill, generous, and deferential as Paddington. On top of that, Pooh rolls deep, with a crew more pure of heart than AFC Richmond.
But I digress. The point is not to disparage Paddington, himself an international treasure, but to question why Winnie the Pooh does not receive more love among Americans? This ride, that is why. It is rudimentary and dated (despite not being that old), failing to showcase the heart and charm of these beloved characters.
An attraction based on Winnie the Pooh should be timeless, filled with childlike wonder, and more popular than Peter Pan’s Flight. We know a Pooh-centric attraction can reach these heights because there is an older one that is exactly all of these things…but it’s at Tokyo Disneyland.
Peter Pan’s Flight – Speaking of which, this is bound to be a controversial pick. That’s especially true given the enduring popularity of Peter Pan’s Flight and the fact that it commands some of the longest wait times in all of Walt Disney World. Rather, Peter Pan’s Flight makes the list despite its popularity.
As good as the attraction premise is and as special as it is to fly over the streets of London and Neverland, it still has unrealized potential. Plussing the ride to integrate projection mapping or other lighting effects–as has been done in Anaheim, Paris, Shanghai, and Tokyo–could be a gamechanger. Overhauling the ride system so the flight is less jerky and more smooth would help with suspension of disbelief.
Imagineering got it right with Peter Pan’s Flight decades ago, and it is a truly timeless attraction that will be enjoyed by generations of guests to come. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t little ways to enhance the attraction to keep the icon fresh. Imagineering has done exactly that with Haunted Mansion and Pirates of the Caribbean over the last several years. They’ve also done this with other versions of Peter Pan’s Flight around the world.
Beauty and the Beast: Live on Stage — This stage show retelling Beauty and the Beast in condensed form is literally as old as the animated movie itself. It’s enjoyable, doing an adequate job with choreography, performances, and dramatic styling. Not every theatrical production needs to be edgy or envelope-pushing to grab guests’ attention. Sometimes simple-but-good is more than enough.
Those are fair points, but this just feels old. I can’t quite articulate why or how, but pretty much everything about it just gives off 1990s vibes. In isolation, it’s difficult to point to any specific element that gives the show away as being dated.
It’s the totality of it all, and how it contrasts with newer adaptations of animated movies that gives it away. So many more modern productions have come and gone at Disneyland and Disney Cruise Line that could be plugged into DHS and would be a breath of fresh air, comparatively speaking.
Space Mountain — I’ve long defended Magic Kingdom’s Space Mountain, which remains my favorite even compared to the newer versions at Disneyland and beyond. Although it lacks audio…and a smooth ride…it makes up for that with more personality in the queue, post-show, and the ride itself. However, I’m very cognizant of the fact that this is the nostalgic in me speaking.
The datedness of this dark roller coaster has been thrown into even starker relief now that TRON Lightcycle Run is open directly next door to it. This actually isn’t as pronounced as I expected given that they’re very different, but TRON certainly feels more modern and larger scale, from its swooping canopy to its queue and loading area, ride vehicles, and obviously the coaster itself.
I don’t know what the solution is, and I’d hate to lose Space Mountain and all of its history and iconic qualities, but having two in-the-dark roller coasters right next to one another was always going to result in side-by-side guest comparisons, and the circa-1975 Space Mountain is woefully outdated as compared to the circa-2016 TRON Lightcycle Run. Tokyo Disneyland is rebuilding its Space Mountain, with the new version set to open in 2027; perhaps that’s the solution, but we doubt there’s space for that Space in Magic Kingdom.
Planning a Walt Disney World trip? Learn about hotels on our Walt Disney World Hotels Reviews page. For where to eat, read our Walt Disney World Restaurant Reviews. To save money on tickets or determine which type to buy, read our Tips for Saving Money on Walt Disney World Tickets post. Our What to Pack for Disney Trips post takes a unique look at clever items to take. For what to do and when to do it, our Walt Disney World Ride Guides will help. For comprehensive advice, the best place to start is our Walt Disney World Trip Planning Guide for everything you need to know!
YOUR THOUGHTS
Do any attractions at Walt Disney World strike you as particularly outdated or obsolete? Think there are any newer rides that have aged poorly by virtue of leaning too heavily into evolving technologies? Anything you think our list “snubbed” that belongs among WDW’s outdated rides? Do you agree or disagree with our list? Any questions we can help you answer? Hearing your feedback–even when you disagree with us–is both interesting to us and helpful to other readers, so please share your thoughts below in the comments!
